Essential question: How does gun control effect the area where it is enacted.
Claim: Gun control does not reduce deaths in a specific area.
Reason: It will leave innocents unarmed. Civilians living without private gun ownership would be left defenseless and unable to provide for themselves and their families.
Evidence:in alaska the climate is not the heir is rampant crime and wild animals that are barely held at bay now with private gun ownership. The police are unable to get to places quick enough to stop a robbery or bear attack, so the main defense people have is to buy a gun.
The banning of private gun ownership would also leave people defenseless in the event of a catastrophic event, people would most likely be on their own to defend themselves against other hostile people. A riot would have the same reasoning of the police being unable to defend everyone that they have to.
No comments:
Post a Comment